On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:52:47PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:39:39PM +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > Okay. I will improve on it. Just inform me after testing that if any other > > changes are required. I guess [PATCH 1/3] and [PATCH 2/3] are okay, so I > > will > > only send v3 of [PATCH 3/3] after suggested changes. > > FWIW, there's a recent conversation on us...@linux.kernel.org about > updating individual patches in a series (sorry, can't find a link to > it). But the gist of it was that posting only [v3 3/3] leads to > confusion because > > - we can't tell whether [v3 1/3] and [v3 2/3] got lost en-route, and > > - collecting things from v2 and v3 is more work for the maintainer. > > Bottom line: repost the whole series, even if some patches haven't > changed. Thanks a lot for updating me with the info :D . I sent the whole series as v3 hours ago.
--Vaibhav Gupta > > Bjorn
