If a swap entry tests positive for either is_[migration|hwpoison]_entry(),
then its swap_type() is among SWP_MIGRATION_READ, SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE and
SWP_HWPOISON. All these types >= MAX_SWAPFILES, exactly what is asserted
with non_swap_entry().
So the checking non_swap_entry() in is_hugetlb_entry_migration() and
is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned() is redundant.
Let's remove it to optimize code.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.krav...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com>
---
v2->v3:
Updated patch log according to Anshuman's comment.
mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 3569e731e66b..c14837854392 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3748,7 +3748,7 @@ bool is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte_t pte)
if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte))
return false;
swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
- if (non_swap_entry(swp) && is_migration_entry(swp))
+ if (is_migration_entry(swp))
return true;
else
return false;
@@ -3761,7 +3761,7 @@ static bool is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte_t pte)
if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte))
return false;
swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
- if (non_swap_entry(swp) && is_hwpoison_entry(swp))
+ if (is_hwpoison_entry(swp))
return true;
else
return false;
--
2.17.2
