Hi Reinette, On 08/07/2020 17:39, James Morse wrote: > These are the miscellaneous cleanup patches that floated to the top of > the MPAM tree.
Is there anything else I should do with this series? (Does patch 10 need an ACK from anyone else?) Would a branch or pull request make anyone's life easier? Thanks, James > The only interesting thing are the patches to make the AMD/Intel > differences something resctrl understands, instead of just 'happening' > because of the different function pointers. > This will become more important once MPAM support is added. parse_bw() > and friends are what enforces resctrl's ABI. Allowing an > architecture/platform to provide a subtly different function here would > be bad for user-space. > > MPAM would set arch_has_sparse_bitmaps and arch_has_empty_bitmap, but > not arch_needs_linear. > Nothing in this series should change any behaviour.