> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 12:33 AM
> To: Rakesh Pillai <pill...@codeaurora.org>; 'Andrew Lunn'
> <and...@lunn.ch>
> Cc: ath...@lists.infradead.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; kv...@codeaurora.org; johan...@sipsolutions.net;
> da...@davemloft.net; k...@kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org;
> diand...@chromium.org; evgr...@chromium.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread
>
> On 7/23/20 11:21 AM, Rakesh Pillai wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 11:35 PM
> >> To: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>; Rakesh Pillai
> <pill...@codeaurora.org>
> >> Cc: ath...@lists.infradead.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> >> ker...@vger.kernel.org; kv...@codeaurora.org;
> johan...@sipsolutions.net;
> >> da...@davemloft.net; k...@kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org;
> >> diand...@chromium.org; evgr...@chromium.org
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread
> >>
> >> On 7/21/20 10:25 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:44:19PM +0530, Rakesh Pillai wrote:
> >>>> NAPI gets scheduled on the CPU core which got the
> >>>> interrupt. The linux scheduler cannot move it to a
> >>>> different core, even if the CPU on which NAPI is running
> >>>> is heavily loaded. This can lead to degraded wifi
> >>>> performance when running traffic at peak data rates.
> >>>>
> >>>> A thread on the other hand can be moved to different
> >>>> CPU cores, if the one on which its running is heavily
> >>>> loaded. During high incoming data traffic, this gives
> >>>> better performance, since the thread can be moved to a
> >>>> less loaded or sometimes even a more powerful CPU core
> >>>> to account for the required CPU performance in order
> >>>> to process the incoming packets.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch series adds the support to use a high priority
> >>>> thread to process the incoming packets, as opposed to
> >>>> everything being done in NAPI context.
> >>>
> >>> I don't see why this problem is limited to the ath10k driver. I expect
> >>> it applies to all drivers using NAPI. So shouldn't you be solving this
> >>> in the NAPI core? Allow a driver to request the NAPI core uses a
> >>> thread?
> >>
> >> What's more, you should be able to configure interrupt affinity to steer
> >> RX processing onto a desired CPU core, is not that working for you
> >> somehow?
> >
> > Hi Florian,
> > Yes, the affinity of IRQ does work for me.
> > But the affinity of IRQ does not happen runtime based on load.
>
> It can if you also run irqbalance.
Hi Florian,
Is it some kernel feature ? Sorry I am not aware of this ?
I know it can be done in userspace.
> --
> Florian
