On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 01:39, Jiang Biao <humjb_1...@163.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jiang Biao <benbji...@tencent.com>
>
> Sched-idle CPU has been considered in select_idle_cpu and
> select_idle_smt, it also needs to be considered in select_idle_core to
> be consistent and keep the same *idle* policy.
In the case of select_idle_core, we are looking for a core that is
fully idle but if one CPU of the core is running a sched_idle task,
the core will not be idle and we might end up having the wakeup task
on a CPU and a sched_idle task on another CPU of the core which is not
what we want
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <benbji...@tencent.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 04fa8dbcfa4d..f430a9820d08 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6014,7 +6014,7 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
> if (cpu == core)
> continue;
>
> - if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu))
> + if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu) && !sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> @@ -6045,7 +6045,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p,
> struct sched_domain *sd, int
> bool idle = true;
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
> - if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> + if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu) && !sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> {
> idle = false;
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
