On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:15:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote: > > Hello Greg, > > > > (Re-sending this pull request) > > > > This is habanalabs pull request for the merge window of kernel 5.9. It > > contains many small improvements to common and GAUDI code. Details are in > > the tag. > > > > Thanks, > > Oded > > > > The following changes since commit 7a4462a96777b64b22412f782de226c90290bf75: > > > > misc: rtsx: Use standard PCI definitions (2020-07-22 13:39:31 +0200) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/linux > > tags/misc-habanalabs-next-2020-07-23 > > {sigh} > > Commit: 961a7325e670 ("habanalabs: Fix memory leak in error flow of context > init") > Fixes tag: Fixes: 786c94810698 ("habanalabs: Use pending cs amount > per asic") > Has these problem(s): > - Subject does not match target commit subject > Just use > git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")' > > The scripts I use to check this are here: > > https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_fixes.sh > > https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_signedoff.sh > > And note, if I ignore these errors, you will just get the same response > from Stephen when it hits linux-next :( > > thanks, > > greg k-h
I'm sorry for all the trouble Greg, but I wanted to ask before I send it again, won't the fixed sha-id be wrong once you merge this pull request to your tree ? Because this patch fixes a previous patch in this pull-request. Maybe I should just squash them ? Thanks, Oded