On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:15:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > Hello Greg,
> >
> > (Re-sending this pull request)
> >
> > This is habanalabs pull request for the merge window of kernel 5.9. It
> > contains many small improvements to common and GAUDI code. Details are in
> > the tag.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Oded
> >
> > The following changes since commit 7a4462a96777b64b22412f782de226c90290bf75:
> >
> > misc: rtsx: Use standard PCI definitions (2020-07-22 13:39:31 +0200)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/linux
> > tags/misc-habanalabs-next-2020-07-23
>
> {sigh}
>
> Commit: 961a7325e670 ("habanalabs: Fix memory leak in error flow of context
> init")
> Fixes tag: Fixes: 786c94810698 ("habanalabs: Use pending cs amount
> per asic")
> Has these problem(s):
> - Subject does not match target commit subject
> Just use
> git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")'
>
> The scripts I use to check this are here:
>
> https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_fixes.sh
>
> https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_signedoff.sh
>
> And note, if I ignore these errors, you will just get the same response
> from Stephen when it hits linux-next :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I'm sorry for all the trouble Greg, but I wanted to ask before I send
it again, won't the fixed sha-id be wrong once you merge this pull
request to your tree ?
Because this patch fixes a previous patch in this pull-request.
Maybe I should just squash them ?
Thanks,
Oded
