On Oct 30 2007 12:14, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >while others including SELinux will go their own ways. So long >as LSMs are self contained and strictly restrictive the >mechanisms they use to modulate their behavior shouldn't be an >issue. If SELinux chooses to turn its MLS controls off between >midnight and 3am I can't see how that would be Smack's business, >even if they were somehow stacked. Multiple LSMs has issues, >like what should security_secid_to_secctx() return to the audit >system, but privilege model shouldn't be one of them.
I am with you on that. And for everybody who missed it: MultiAdmin only grants rights at the same time commoncap does (e.g. on setuid and bprm_set_security). And all modules DO work with commoncap, now don't they? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
