On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:41:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Generally, don't silence static checker warnings unless it makes the > code more readable. It's the checker writer's job to fix their own code. > In this case, that's me, but parsing the code is quite complicated and I > don't have a plan for how to fix it.
Actually, looking at this some more, it's not so complicated. By this time next year hopefully this warning will be silenced. regards, dan carpenter
