On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:24 PM Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 21:19 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:14 PM Daniel Campello <campe...@chromium.org> 
> > wrote:
> > > From: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org>
> > >
> > > Printks in the kernel have newlines at the end. Add them to the few
> >
> > Printk()s
> >
> > > printks in this driver.
> >
> > printk()s
>
> Random kernel pedantry.
> This patch should not need to be respun for any of these.

If for above I can agree with you, below is definitely subject to improvement.

>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Campello <campe...@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
> > > Fixes: 72ad02b15d63 ("iio: Add SEMTECH SX9310/9311 sensor driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campe...@chromium.org>
> >
> > It has ordering issues
> > Should be
> >
> > Fixes:
> > SoB: Stephen
> > Rb: Douglas
> > Rb: Daniel
> > SoB: Daniel
> >
> >
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c | 8 ++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c 
> > > b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > > index 3f981d28ee4056..4553ee83a016a3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c
> > > @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static int sx9310_init_compensation(struct iio_dev 
> > > *indio_dev)
> > >         if (ret) {
> > >                 if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> > >                         dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> > > -                               "0x02 << 3l compensation timed out: 
> > > 0x%02x",
> > > +                               "0x02 << 3l compensation timed out: 
> > > 0x%02x\n",
> >
> > Looks like ping-pong style in the series, i.e. you may fix this when
> > you introduced this line.
> >
> > Check the rest (and not only printk()s) for the similar style and
> > avoid the latter.
> >
> > >                                 val);
> > >                 return ret;
> > >         }
> > > @@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static int sx9310_set_indio_dev_name(struct device 
> > > *dev,
> > >
> > >         ddata = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(dev);
> > >         if (ddata != whoami) {
> > > -               dev_err(dev, "WHOAMI does not match device data: %u", 
> > > whoami);
> > > +               dev_err(dev, "WHOAMI does not match device data: %u\n", 
> > > whoami);
> > >                 return -ENODEV;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static int sx9310_set_indio_dev_name(struct device 
> > > *dev,
> > >                 indio_dev->name = "sx9311";
> > >                 break;
> > >         default:
> > > -               dev_err(dev, "unexpected WHOAMI response: %u", whoami);
> > > +               dev_err(dev, "unexpected WHOAMI response: %u\n", whoami);
> > >                 return -ENODEV;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static int sx9310_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > >
> > >         ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, SX9310_REG_WHOAMI, &data->whoami);
> > >         if (ret) {
> > > -               dev_err(dev, "error in reading WHOAMI register: %d", ret);
> > > +               dev_err(dev, "error in reading WHOAMI register: %d\n", 
> > > ret);
> > >                 return ret;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0.rc0.142.g3c755180ce-goog
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to