On 7/28/20 7:11 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Use the existing PR_GET/SET_SPECULATION_CTRL API to expose the L1D
> flush capability. For L1D flushing PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE and
> PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC are not supported.
> 
> There is also no seccomp integration for the feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/mm/tlb.c          | 25 +++++++++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/prctl.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 0b71970d2d3d..935ea88313ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ enum taa_mitigations {
>       TAA_MITIGATION_TSX_DISABLED,
>  };
>  
> +enum l1d_flush_out_mitigations {
> +     L1D_FLUSH_OUT_OFF,
> +     L1D_FLUSH_OUT_ON,
> +};
> +
> +static enum l1d_flush_out_mitigations l1d_flush_out_mitigation 
> __ro_after_init = L1D_FLUSH_OUT_ON;
> +
>  /* Default mitigation for TAA-affected CPUs */
>  static enum taa_mitigations taa_mitigation __ro_after_init = 
> TAA_MITIGATION_VERW;
>  static bool taa_nosmt __ro_after_init;
> @@ -378,6 +385,18 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void)
>       pr_info("%s\n", taa_strings[taa_mitigation]);
>  }
>  
> +static int __init l1d_flush_out_parse_cmdline(char *str)
> +{
> +     if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF))
> +             return 0;

Shouldn't this set the l1d_flush_out_mitigation to L1D_FLUSH_OUT_OFF since
it is set to L1D_FLUSH_OUT_ON by default? Or does it not matter because
the enable_l1d_flush_for_task() will return -EINVAL if the cpu doesn't
have the L1TF bug?

I guess it depends on what you want l1d_flush_out_prctl_set() and
l1d_flush_out_prctl_get() to return in this case.

Thanks,
Tom

> +
> +     if (!strcmp(str, "off"))
> +             l1d_flush_out_mitigation = L1D_FLUSH_OUT_OFF;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("l1d_flush_out", l1d_flush_out_parse_cmdline);
> +
>  static int __init tsx_async_abort_parse_cmdline(char *str)
>  {
>       if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA))
> @@ -1220,6 +1239,23 @@ static void task_update_spec_tif(struct task_struct 
> *tsk)
>               speculation_ctrl_update_current();
>  }
>  
> +static int l1d_flush_out_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long 
> ctrl)
> +{
> +
> +     if (l1d_flush_out_mitigation == L1D_FLUSH_OUT_OFF)
> +             return -EPERM;
> +
> +     switch (ctrl) {
> +     case PR_SPEC_ENABLE:
> +             return enable_l1d_flush_for_task(task);
> +     case PR_SPEC_DISABLE:
> +             return disable_l1d_flush_for_task(task);
> +     default:
> +             return -ERANGE;
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int ssb_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long ctrl)
>  {
>       if (ssb_mode != SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_PRCTL &&
> @@ -1312,6 +1348,8 @@ int arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(struct task_struct *task, 
> unsigned long which,
>               return ssb_prctl_set(task, ctrl);
>       case PR_SPEC_INDIRECT_BRANCH:
>               return ib_prctl_set(task, ctrl);
> +     case PR_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH_OUT:
> +             return l1d_flush_out_prctl_set(task, ctrl);
>       default:
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> @@ -1328,6 +1366,20 @@ void arch_seccomp_spec_mitigate(struct task_struct 
> *task)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static int l1d_flush_out_prctl_get(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (l1d_flush_out_mitigation == L1D_FLUSH_OUT_OFF)
> +             return PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE;
> +
> +     ret = test_ti_thread_flag(&task->thread_info, TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_ENABLE;
> +     else
> +             return PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_DISABLE;
> +}
> +
>  static int ssb_prctl_get(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>       switch (ssb_mode) {
> @@ -1381,6 +1433,8 @@ int arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(struct task_struct *task, 
> unsigned long which)
>               return ssb_prctl_get(task);
>       case PR_SPEC_INDIRECT_BRANCH:
>               return ib_prctl_get(task);
> +     case PR_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH_OUT:
> +             return l1d_flush_out_prctl_get(task);
>       default:
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> index 48ccc3dd1492..77b739929ad2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -316,8 +316,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(leave_mm);
>  
>  int enable_l1d_flush_for_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> +     int cpu, ret = 0, i;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Do not enable L1D_FLUSH_OUT if
> +      * b. The CPU is not affected by the L1TF bug
> +      * c. The CPU does not have L1D FLUSH feature support
> +      * c. The task's affinity is on cores with SMT on.
> +      */
> +
> +     if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF) ||
> +                     !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     cpu = get_cpu();
> +
> +     for_each_cpu(i, &tsk->cpus_mask) {
> +             if (cpu_data(i).smt_active == true) {
> +                     put_cpu();
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       set_ti_thread_flag(&tsk->thread_info, TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH);
> -     return 0;
> +     put_cpu();
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  int disable_l1d_flush_for_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> index 07b4f8131e36..1e864867a367 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct prctl_mm_map {
>  /* Speculation control variants */
>  # define PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS                0
>  # define PR_SPEC_INDIRECT_BRANCH     1
> +# define PR_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH_OUT               2
>  /* Return and control values for PR_SET/GET_SPECULATION_CTRL */
>  # define PR_SPEC_NOT_AFFECTED                0
>  # define PR_SPEC_PRCTL                       (1UL << 0)
> 

Reply via email to