Hi, I think the reclaim target is a concept that is not just an implementation detail and hence it should be documented how it applies to protection configuration (the first patch). Second patch is a "best practice" bit of information, it may be squashed with the first one. The last patch just makes docs indefinite until the idea is implemented.
Michal Koutný (3): docs: cgroup: Explain reclaim protection target docs: cgroup: Note about sibling relative reclaim protection docs: cgroup: No special handling of unpopulated memcgs Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.27.0
