On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:11:51PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote: > This adds the conversion of the test_sort.c to KUnit test. > > Please apply this commit first (linux-kselftest/kunit-fixes): > 3f37d14b8a3152441f36b6bc74000996679f0998 kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of > CONFIG options with space
Looks like you mixed up commit message and changelog / comments. > Code Style Documentation: [0] > > Fix these warnings Reported-by l...@intel.com > > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.data+0x4fc70): Section mismatch in reference > from the variable sort_test_cases to the variable .init.text:sort_test > The variable sort_test_cases references > the variable __init sort_test > If the reference is valid then annotate the > variable with or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable > > WARNING: modpost: lib/sort_kunit.o(.data+0x11c): Section mismatch in > reference from the variable sort_test_cases to the function > .init.text:sort_test() > The variable sort_test_cases references > the function __init sort_test() > Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vi...@massaru.org> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> > Link: [0] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200620054944.167330-1-david...@google.com/T/#u This should be in different order: Link, Reported-by, SoB. Also [0] is unnecessary > lib/{test_sort.c => sort_kunit.c} | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------- Still opened question why kunit is a suffix? Can't we leave same name? Can't we do it rather prefix? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
