On Wed 29 Jul 10:40 PDT 2020, Siddharth Gupta wrote:

> Add the character device during rproc_add. This would create
> a character device node at /dev/remoteproc<index>. Userspace
> applications can interact with the remote processor using this
> interface.
> 

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>

> Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risha...@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sid...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 277d3bf..7f90eee 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1986,6 +1986,11 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
>       /* create debugfs entries */
>       rproc_create_debug_dir(rproc);
>  
> +     /* add char device for this remoteproc */
> +     ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
>       /*
>        * Remind ourselves the remote processor has been attached to rather
>        * than booted by the remoteproc core.  This is important because the
> @@ -2262,6 +2267,7 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
>       mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
>  
>       rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
> +     rproc_char_device_remove(rproc);
>  
>       /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */
>       mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> @@ -2430,6 +2436,7 @@ static int __init remoteproc_init(void)
>  {
>       rproc_init_sysfs();
>       rproc_init_debugfs();
> +     rproc_init_cdev();
>       rproc_init_panic();
>  
>       return 0;
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

Reply via email to