"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
>
> Move the locking away from intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_index()
> into its only caller and drop the (now redundant) return_pref label
> from it.
>
> Also move the "raw" EPP value check into the caller of that function,
> so as to do it before acquiring the mutex, and reduce code duplication
> related to the "raw" EPP values processing somewhat.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <[email protected]>

> ---
>
> v2 -> v3:
>
>    * Fix error handling in intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_index() and
>      rebase.
>
> v3 -> v4: No changes
>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -649,28 +649,18 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_
>       if (!pref_index)
>               epp = cpu_data->epp_default;
>  
> -     mutex_lock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
> -
>       if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
>               u64 value;
>  
>               ret = rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu_data->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, &value);
>               if (ret)
> -                     goto return_pref;
> +                     return ret;
>  
>               value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 24);
>  
> -             if (use_raw) {
> -                     if (raw_epp > 255) {
> -                             ret = -EINVAL;
> -                             goto return_pref;
> -                     }
> -                     value |= (u64)raw_epp << 24;
> -                     ret = wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu_data->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, 
> value);
> -                     goto return_pref;
> -             }
> -
> -             if (epp == -EINVAL)
> +             if (use_raw)
> +                     epp = raw_epp;
> +             else if (epp == -EINVAL)
>                       epp = epp_values[pref_index - 1];
>  
>               value |= (u64)epp << 24;
> @@ -680,8 +670,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_
>                       epp = (pref_index - 1) << 2;
>               ret = intel_pstate_set_epb(cpu_data->cpu, epp);
>       }
> -return_pref:
> -     mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
>  
>       return ret;
>  }
> @@ -708,8 +696,8 @@ static ssize_t store_energy_performance_
>       struct cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
>       char str_preference[21];
>       bool raw = false;
> +     ssize_t ret;
>       u32 epp = 0;
> -     int ret;
>  
>       ret = sscanf(buf, "%20s", str_preference);
>       if (ret != 1)
> @@ -724,14 +712,21 @@ static ssize_t store_energy_performance_
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
>  
> +             if (epp > 255)
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +
>               raw = true;
>       }
>  
> +     mutex_lock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
> +
>       ret = intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_index(cpu_data, ret, raw, epp);
> -     if (ret)
> -             return ret;
> +     if (!ret)
> +             ret = count;
>  
> -     return count;
> +     mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
> +
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t show_energy_performance_preference(

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to