On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 6:45 PM Daniel Campello <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:00 AM Andy Shevchenko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:03 AM Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Quoting Daniel Campello (2020-07-28 16:05:13) > > > > Uses for_each_set_bit() macro to loop over channel bitmaps. > > > > ... > > > > > > + unsigned long chan_prox_stat; > > > > > > This can be DECLARE_BITMAP(chan_prox_stat, SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS) > > > > > > + unsigned long chan_read; > > > > + unsigned long chan_event; > > > > > > Same for these? > All of these are eventually used by regmap_update_bits() which expects > unsigned int. I believe the extra complexity is not worth it given the > number of channels.
Okay then. Good to have some build check for the limitation, so, what about adding static_assert(..._NUM_CHANNELS < BITS_PER_LONG); after the _NUM_CHANNELS definition? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
