On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:41 AM Paul A. Clarke <p...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:18:49AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in > > another metric. > > > > For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like: > > > > { > > "BriefDescription": "Instructions Per Cycle (per Logical > > Processor)", > > - "MetricExpr": "INST_RETIRED.ANY / CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD", > > + "MetricExpr": "1/CPI", > > "MetricGroup": "TopDownL1", > > "MetricName": "IPC" > > }, > > > > I won't be able to find all the possible places we could > > use this at, so I wonder you guys (who was asking for this) > > would try it and come up with comments if there's something > > missing or we could already use it at some places. > > > > It's based on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core. > > > > v4 changes: > > - removed acks from patch because it changed a bit > > with the last fixes: > > perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node > > - fixed runtime metrics [Kajol Jain] > > - increased recursion depth [Paul A. Clarke] > > - changed patches due to dependencies: > > perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node > > perf metric: Add recursion check when processing nested metrics > > perf metric: Rename struct egroup to metric > > perf metric: Rename group_list to metric_list > > > > Also available in here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git > > perf/metric > > I built and ran from the above git branch, and things seem to work. > Indeed, I was able to apply my changes to exploit the new capabilities > via modifications to tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/metrics.json, > as I posted earlier (and will submit once this set gets merged). > > Tested-by: Paul A. Clarke <p...@us.ibm.com> > > One thing I noted, but which also occurs without these patches, is that > the perf metrics are not computed unless run as root: > -- > $ perf stat --metrics br_misprediction_percent command > > Performance counter stats for 'command': > > 1,823,530,051 pm_br_pred:u > 2,662,705 pm_br_mpred_cmpl:u > > $ /usr/bin/sudo perf stat --metrics br_misprediction_percent command > > Performance counter stats for 'command': > > 1,824,655,269 pm_br_pred # 0.09 > br_misprediction_percent > 1,654,466 pm_br_mpred_cmpl > -- > > Is that expected? I don't think it's always been that way.
I agree Paul, this seems broken. I've noticed a bunch of issues with printing CSV, per-socket output and so on. Jiri may have a better idea but I plan to look at problems in this area later, and hopefully stick a few tests on it :-) Thanks, Ian > PC