On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:51:47AM +0800, Liwei Song wrote: > > On 8/3/20 20:52, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:58:58PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote: > >> exist the following assignment in ccp(ignore the force > >> convert of the struct) by list_del in ccp_dequeue_cmd(): > >> req->__ctx->cmd->entry->next = LIST_POISON1; > >> > >> after use the req, kzfree(req) can not zero the entry > >> entry->next = LIST_POISON1 of the ccp_cmd(cmd) struct > >> when this address available as slub freelist pointer, this will cause > >> the following "general protection fault" error if some process meet > >> this LIST_POISON1 value address when request memory: > > > > Your description makes no sense. Please rewrite it and explain > > the problem properly. > > The problem here is that the entry of struct ccp_cmd is not zeroed after we > use it, > If the other process got this address by kmalloc(), this illegal value > "LIST_POISON1" > will cause "general protection fault" error.
If that's the case surely the other process should be zeroing the memory? Your explanation still makes no sense. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
