在 2020/8/4 上午6:45, Alexander Duyck 写道:
> Just to correct a typo, I meant patch 17, not 18. in the comment below.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:42 PM Alexander Duyck
> <alexander.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 6:00 AM Alex Shi <alex....@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now pgdat.lru_lock was replaced by lruvec lock. It's not used anymore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex....@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebni...@yandex-team.ru>
>>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hu...@google.com>
>>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
>>> Cc: linux...@kvack.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> I really think this would be better just squashed into patch 18
>> instead of as a standalone patch since you were moving all of the
>> locking anyway so it would be more likely to trigger build errors if
>> somebody didn't move a lock somewhere that was referencing this.

Thanks for comments!
If someone changed the lru_lock between patch 17 and this, it would cause
more troubles then build error here. :) so don't warries for that.
But on the other side, I am so insist to have a ceremony to remove this lock...
  
>>
>> That said this change is harmless at this point.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.du...@linux.intel.com>

Thanks a lot for review!

Reply via email to