Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]> wrote: > > + __u32 shared_group_id; /* Shared: mount group ID */ > > + __u32 dependent_source_id; /* Dependent: source mount group ID */ > > + __u32 dependent_clone_of_id; /* Dependent: ID of mount this was > > cloned from */ > > Another set of ID's that are currently 32bit *internally* but that doesn't > mean they will always be 32 bit. > > And that last one (apart from "slave" being obfuscated)
I had "slave" in there. It got objected to. See Documentation/process/coding-style.rst section 4. > is simply incorrect. It has nothing to do with cloning. It's the "ID of > the closest peer group in the propagation chain that has a representative > mount in the current root". You appear to be in disagreement with others that I've asked. David
