On 8/4/20 11:48 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
> If a compound page is being split while dump_page() is being run on that
> page, we can end up calling compound_mapcount() on a page that is no
> longer compound. This leads to a crash (already seen at least once in
> the field), due to the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() assertion inside
> compound_mapcount().
> 
> (The above is from Matthew Wilcox's analysis of Qian Cai's bug report.)
> 
> A similar problem is possible, via compound_pincount() instead of
> compound_mapcount().
> 
> In order to avoid this kind of crash, make dump_page() slightly more
> robust, by providing a pair of simpler routines that don't contain
> assertions: head_mapcount() and head_pincount().
> 
> For debug tools, we don't want to go *too* far in this direction, but
> this is a simple small fix, and the crash has already been seen, so it's
> a good trade-off.
> 
> Reported-by: Qian Cai <c...@lca.pw>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>

> ---
> Hi,
> 
> I'm assuming that a fix is not required for -stable, but let me know if
> others feel differently. The dump_page() code has changed a lot in that
> area.

I'd say only if we backport all those changes, as most were to avoid similar
kind of crashes?
How about this additional patch now that we have head_mapcoun()? (I wouldn't
go for squashing as the goal and scope is too different).

----8<----
>From 3b3d5b4639eea9c0787eed510a32acdc918d569f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 13:33:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mm, thp: use head_mapcount when we know we have a head page

Patch "mm, dump_page: do not crash with bad compound_mapcount()" has introduced
head_mapcount() to split out the part of compound_mapcount() where we already
know/assume we have a head page. We can use the new function in more places
where we already have a head page, to avoid the overhead of compound_head()
and (with DEBUG_VM) a debug check. This patch does that. There are few more
applicable places, but behind DEBUG_VM so performance is not important, and the
extra debug check in compound_mapcount() could be useful instead.

The bloat-o-meter difference without DEBUG_VM is the following:

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/4 up/down: 32/-56 (-24)
Function                                     old     new   delta
__split_huge_pmd                            2867    2899     +32
shrink_page_list                            3860    3847     -13
reuse_swap_page                              762     748     -14
page_trans_huge_mapcount                     153     139     -14
total_mapcount                               187     172     -15
Total: Before=8687306, After=8687282, chg -0.00%

This just shows that compiler wasn't able to prove we have a head page by
itself. In __split_huge_pmd() the eliminated check probably led to different
optimization decisions thus code size increased.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 6 +++---
 mm/swapfile.c    | 2 +-
 mm/vmscan.c      | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 90733cefa528..5927874b7894 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct 
*vma, pmd_t *pmd,
         * Set PG_double_map before dropping compound_mapcount to avoid
         * false-negative page_mapped().
         */
-       if (compound_mapcount(page) > 1 && !TestSetPageDoubleMap(page)) {
+       if (head_mapcount(page) > 1 && !TestSetPageDoubleMap(page)) {
                for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++)
                        atomic_inc(&page[i]._mapcount);
        }
@@ -2467,7 +2467,7 @@ int total_mapcount(struct page *page)
        if (likely(!PageCompound(page)))
                return atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) + 1;
 
-       compound = compound_mapcount(page);
+       compound = head_mapcount(page);
        if (PageHuge(page))
                return compound;
        ret = compound;
@@ -2531,7 +2531,7 @@ int page_trans_huge_mapcount(struct page *page, int 
*total_mapcount)
                ret -= 1;
                _total_mapcount -= HPAGE_PMD_NR;
        }
-       mapcount = compound_mapcount(page);
+       mapcount = head_mapcount(page);
        ret += mapcount;
        _total_mapcount += mapcount;
        if (total_mapcount)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 9ee4211835c6..c5e722de38b8 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static int page_trans_huge_map_swapcount(struct page 
*page, int *total_mapcount,
                map_swapcount -= 1;
                _total_mapcount -= HPAGE_PMD_NR;
        }
-       mapcount = compound_mapcount(page);
+       mapcount = head_mapcount(page);
        map_swapcount += mapcount;
        _total_mapcount += mapcount;
        if (total_mapcount)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a086c104a9a6..72218cdfd902 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_page_list(struct list_head 
*page_list,
                                         * away. Chances are some or all of the
                                         * tail pages can be freed without IO.
                                         */
-                                       if (!compound_mapcount(page) &&
+                                       if (!head_mapcount(page) &&
                                            split_huge_page_to_list(page,
                                                                    page_list))
                                                goto activate_locked;
-- 
2.28.0

Reply via email to