-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Having access to the same IPCs in different pid namespaces won't work. > Having access to the same filesystem in different IPC namespaces won't work. > Having access to the same UID namespace in different VFS namespaces won't > work. > Having access to the same <any> namespace in different <many others> namespace > wont' work. > [...]
Then explicitly prevent the cases which cannot work in the clone() calls. Yes, giving people rope to shoot themselves is a Unix tradition but it's so unnecessary in this case and will only cause support problems for innocent people. I bet the result will be that if you have a separate PID namespace you need to enforce every other namespace as well. There are simply too many dependencies. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHK/pL2ijCOnn/RHQRAtp6AKC8QIRvJa4qVUSx9IVpRq6X+6HPGQCff/hT m2tpKWmeM+xAfS5ICvB0NVk= =5ozn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
