On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 05:38:37PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 07/29/2020 06:20 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 06:20:40PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > > Document the bindings for ETMv4.4 and later with only system register > > > access. > > > > > > Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Mike Leach <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 6 +++++- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > index d711676b4a51..cfe47bdda728 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > > > @@ -34,9 +34,13 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > > Program Flow Trace Macrocell: > > > "arm,coresight-etm3x", "arm,primecell"; > > > - - Embedded Trace Macrocell (version 4.x): > > > + - Embedded Trace Macrocell (version 4.x), with memory mapped > > > access. > > > "arm,coresight-etm4x", "arm,primecell"; > > > + - Embedded Trace Macrocell (version 4.4 and later) with system > > > + register access only. > > > + "arm,coresight-etm-v4.4"; > > > > I would rather call this "arm,coresight-etm-v4.4+" so that the binding's > > semantic is still relevant when dealing with ETM v4.5 and onward. > > AFAIUC, "compatible" stands for something that is compatible with v4.4. > All v4.4+ versions that are compatible with v4.4 are covered here.
Your position is valid - let's to with what you had. > Having said that I am fine with "arm,coresight-etm-v4.4+" , if it > is fine by the DT conventions. > > Cheers > Suzuki
