Hi Alim,

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Some UFS host controllers like Exynos uses granularities of PRDT length and
> offset as bytes, whereas others uses actual segment count.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index ee30ed6cc805..ba093d0d0942 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2151,8 +2151,14 @@ static int ufshcd_map_sg(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct 
> ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
>               return sg_segments;
>  
>       if (sg_segments) {
> -             lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length =
> -                     cpu_to_le16((u16)sg_segments);
> +
> +             if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN)
> +                     lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length =
> +                             cpu_to_le16((sg_segments *
> +                                     sizeof(struct ufshcd_sg_entry)));
> +             else
> +                     lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length =
> +                             cpu_to_le16((u16) (sg_segments));
>  
>               prd_table = (struct ufshcd_sg_entry *)lrbp->ucd_prdt_ptr;
>  
> @@ -3500,11 +3506,21 @@ static void ufshcd_host_memory_configure(struct 
> ufs_hba *hba)
>                               
> cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(cmd_desc_element_addr));
>  
>               /* Response upiu and prdt offset should be in double words */
> -             utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset =
> -                     cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2);
> -             utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2);
> -             utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length =
> -                     cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2);
> +             if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) {
> +                     utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset =
> +                             cpu_to_le16(response_offset);
> +                     utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset =
> +                             cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset);
> +                     utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length =
> +                             cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE);
> +             } else {
> +                     utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset =
> +                             cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2);
> +                     utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset =
> +                             cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2);
> +                     utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length =
> +                             cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2);
> +             }
>  
>               ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, &hba->lrb[i], i);
>       }

Isn't this patch missing an update to ufshcd_print_trs()?  It uses
->prd_table_length as the number of segments, not the number of bytes.

- Eric

Reply via email to