On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > > +@r@ > > +identifier var; > > +type T; > > +position p; > > +@@ > > + > > +( > > +* T var@p = var; > > +| > > +* T var@p = *(&(var)); > > I suggest to simplify such code for the semantic patch language a bit. > Can an other variant be more succinct for the application of a SmPL > disjunction? > > +*T var@p = \( var \| *(&(var)) \); It's fine as is. julia
