On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:28:48PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Still to come:
> > >
> > > - Final cleanup of smack_load_write and smack_cipso_write.
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > After agreeing with Casey on the "load" input grammar yesterday, here's
> > the final grammar and its parser (which needs more testing):
> >
> > A Smack Rule in an "egrep" format is:
> >
> > "^[:space:]*Subject[:space:]+Object[:space:]+[rwxaRWXA-]+[:space:]*\n"
> >
> > where Subject/Object strings are in the form:
> >
> > "^[^/[:space:][:cntrl:]]{1,SMK_MAXLEN}$"
>
> Can we avoid string parsers in the kernel?
>
Ok, Could someone suggest a better idea please ?.
I thought about packing the rules in a structure and sending
it over an ioctl() command. Is this applicable ?
>
> > +static inline int isblank(char c)
> > +{
> > + return (c == ' ' || c == '\t');
> > +}
>
> This sounds like enough for 'NAK'.
>
> Pavel,
> who still thinks smack rules should be parsed
> in userspace and compiled into selinux rules...
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures)
> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
