On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:31 PM Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 8/13/2020 12:58 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > From: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> > > > > Fix build error when CONFIG_ACPI is not set/enabled by adding > > the header file <asm/acpi.h> which contains a stub for the function > > in the build error. > > > > ../arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c: In function ‘intel_mid_pci_init’: > > ../arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c:303:2: error: implicit declaration of > > function ‘acpi_noirq_set’; did you mean ‘acpi_irq_get’? > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > acpi_noirq_set();
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> > > Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Len Brown <l...@kernel.org> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> > > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jsbar...@google.com> > > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > Found in linux-next, but applies to/exists in mainline also. > > > > Alternative.1: X86_INTEL_MID depends on ACPI > > Alternative.2: drop X86_INTEL_MID support > > at this point I'd suggest Alternative 2; the products that needed that (past > tense, that technology > is no longer need for any newer products) never shipped in any form where a > 4.x or 5.x kernel could > work, and they are also all locked down... This is not true. We have Intel Edison which runs nicely on vanilla (not everything, some is still requiring a couple of patches, but most of it works out-of-the-box). And for the record, I have been working on removing quite a pile of code (~13kLOCs to the date IIRC) in MID area. Just need some time to fix Edison watchdog for that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
