On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:50 PM Vitor Massaru Iha <vi...@massaru.org> wrote:
>
> KUnit test cases run on kthreads, and kthreads don't have an
> adddress space (current->mm is NULL), but processes have mm.
>
> The purpose of this patch is to allow to borrow mm to KUnit kthread
> after userspace is brought up, because we know that there are processes
> running, at least the process that loaded the module to borrow mm.
>
> This allows, for example, tests such as user_copy_kunit, which uses
> vm_mmap, which needs current->mm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vi...@massaru.org>

Can you put these together in the same patch series as you had before?
When I asked you to split the patch up, I was just asking about that
specific patch within the series. I still think all the patches go
together.

As for this specific patch, I see one minor issue below; other than
that, this looks good to me, so:

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhigg...@google.com>

> ---
> v2:
>     * splitted patch in 3:
>         - Allows to install and load modules in root filesystem;
>         - Provides an userspace memory context when tests are compiled
>           as module;
>         - Convert test_user_copy to KUnit test;
>     * added documentation;
>     * added more explanation;
>     * tested a pointer;
>     * released mput();
> ---
>  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/kunit/test.h                    | 12 ++++++++++++
>  lib/kunit/try-catch.c                   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst 
> b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> index 3c3fe8b5fecc..9f909157be34 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> @@ -448,6 +448,20 @@ We can now use it to test ``struct eeprom_buffer``:
>
>  .. _kunit-on-non-uml:
>
> +User-space context
> +------------------
> +
> +I case you need a user-space context, for now this is only possible through
> +tests compiled as a module. And it will be necessary to use a root filesystem
> +and uml_utilities.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +.. code-block:: bash
> +
> +   ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=60 
> --uml_rootfs_dir=.uml_rootfs
> +
> +
>  KUnit on non-UML architectures
>  ==============================

I think the above documentation change belongs in the other related
patch where you introduce the --uml_rootfs_dir flag.

> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 59f3144f009a..ae3337139c65 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,18 @@ struct kunit {
>          * protect it with some type of lock.
>          */
>         struct list_head resources; /* Protected by lock. */
> +       /*
> +        * KUnit test cases run on kthreads, and kthreads don't have an
> +        * adddress space (current->mm is NULL), but processes have mm.
> +        *
> +        * The purpose of this mm_struct is to allow to borrow mm to KUnit 
> kthread
> +        * after userspace is brought up, because we know that there are 
> processes
> +        * running, at least the process that loaded the module to borrow mm.
> +        *
> +        * This allows, for example, tests such as user_copy_kunit, which uses
> +        * vm_mmap, which needs current->mm.
> +        */
> +       struct mm_struct *mm;
>  };
>
>  void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log);
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
> index 0dd434e40487..d03e2093985b 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
>  #include <linux/completion.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task.h>
>  #include "try-catch-impl.h"
>
>  void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)
> @@ -24,8 +25,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_try_catch_throw);
>  static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data)
>  {
>         struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = data;
> +       struct kunit *test = try_catch->test;
> +
> +       if (test != NULL && test->mm != NULL)
> +               kthread_use_mm(test->mm);
>
>         try_catch->try(try_catch->context);
> +       if (test != NULL && test->mm != NULL) {
> +               kthread_unuse_mm(test->mm);
> +               mmput(test->mm);
> +               test->mm = NULL;
> +       }
>
>         complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, 0);
>  }
> @@ -65,6 +75,9 @@ void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, 
> void *context)
>         try_catch->context = context;
>         try_catch->try_completion = &try_completion;
>         try_catch->try_result = 0;
> +
> +       test->mm = get_task_mm(current);
> +
>         task_struct = kthread_run(kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter,
>                                   try_catch,
>                                   "kunit_try_catch_thread");
>
> base-commit: 725aca9585956676687c4cb803e88f770b0df2b2
> prerequisite-patch-id: 5e5f9a8a05c5680fda1b04c9ab1b95ce91dc88b2
> prerequisite-patch-id: 4d997940f4a9f303424af9bac412de1af861f9d9
> prerequisite-patch-id: 582b6d9d28ce4b71628890ec832df6522ca68de0
> --
> 2.26.2
>

Reply via email to