On Wed 19-08-20 17:20:53, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Currently __set_oom_adj loops through all processes in the system to
> keep oom_score_adj and oom_score_adj_min in sync between processes
> sharing their mm. This is done for any task with more that one mm_users,
> which includes processes with multiple threads (sharing mm and signals).
> However for such processes the loop is unnecessary because their signal
> structure is shared as well.
> Android updates oom_score_adj whenever a tasks changes its role
> (background/foreground/...) or binds to/unbinds from a service, making
> it more/less important. Such operation can happen frequently.
> We noticed that updates to oom_score_adj became more expensive and after
> further investigation found out that the patch mentioned in "Fixes"
> introduced a regression. Using Pixel 4 with a typical Android workload,
> write time to oom_score_adj increased from ~3.57us to ~362us. Moreover
> this regression linearly depends on the number of multi-threaded
> processes running on the system.
> Mark the mm with a new MMF_PROC_SHARED flag bit when task is created with
> CLONE_VM and !CLONE_SIGHAND. Change __set_oom_adj to use MMF_PROC_SHARED
> instead of mm_users to decide whether oom_score_adj update should be
> synchronized between multiple processes. To prevent races between clone()
> and __set_oom_adj(), when oom_score_adj of the process being cloned might
> be modified from userspace, we use oom_adj_mutex. Its scope is changed to
> global and it is renamed into oom_adj_lock for naming consistency with
> oom_lock. Since the combination of CLONE_VM and !CLONE_SIGHAND is rarely
> used the additional mutex lock in that path of the clone() syscall should
> not affect its overall performance. Clearing the MMF_PROC_SHARED flag
> (when the last process sharing the mm exits) is left out of this patch to
> keep it simple and because it is believed that this threading model is
> rare. Should there ever be a need for optimizing that case as well, it
> can be done by hooking into the exit path, likely following the
> mm_update_next_owner pattern.
> With the combination of CLONE_VM and !CLONE_SIGHAND being quite rare, the
> regression is gone after the change is applied.

Yes this seems like a reasonable approach. Should we learn about a
usecase which relies on this threading model we might need a more
sophisticated synchronization but for now this sounds like good enough.

> Fixes: 44a70adec910 ("mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same 
> view of oom_score_adj")
> Reported-by: Tim Murray <timmur...@google.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <sur...@google.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>

Thanks!

> ---
>  fs/proc/base.c                 | 7 +++----
>  include/linux/oom.h            | 1 +
>  include/linux/sched/coredump.h | 1 +
>  kernel/fork.c                  | 9 +++++++++
>  mm/oom_kill.c                  | 2 ++
>  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 617db4e0faa0..cff1a58a236c 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1055,7 +1055,6 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char 
> __user *buf, size_t count,
>  
>  static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
>  {
> -     static DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_adj_mutex);
>       struct mm_struct *mm = NULL;
>       struct task_struct *task;
>       int err = 0;
> @@ -1064,7 +1063,7 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int 
> oom_adj, bool legacy)
>       if (!task)
>               return -ESRCH;
>  
> -     mutex_lock(&oom_adj_mutex);
> +     mutex_lock(&oom_adj_lock);
>       if (legacy) {
>               if (oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj &&
>                               !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
> @@ -1095,7 +1094,7 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int 
> oom_adj, bool legacy)
>               struct task_struct *p = find_lock_task_mm(task);
>  
>               if (p) {
> -                     if (atomic_read(&p->mm->mm_users) > 1) {
> +                     if (test_bit(MMF_PROC_SHARED, &p->mm->flags)) {
>                               mm = p->mm;
>                               mmgrab(mm);
>                       }
> @@ -1132,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int 
> oom_adj, bool legacy)
>               mmdrop(mm);
>       }
>  err_unlock:
> -     mutex_unlock(&oom_adj_mutex);
> +     mutex_unlock(&oom_adj_lock);
>       put_task_struct(task);
>       return err;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> index f022f581ac29..861f22bd4706 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct oom_control {
>  };
>  
>  extern struct mutex oom_lock;
> +extern struct mutex oom_adj_lock;
>  
>  static inline void set_current_oom_origin(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> index ecdc6542070f..070629b722df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static inline int get_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  #define MMF_DISABLE_THP              24      /* disable THP for all VMAs */
>  #define MMF_OOM_VICTIM               25      /* mm is the oom victim */
>  #define MMF_OOM_REAP_QUEUED  26      /* mm was queued for oom_reaper */
> +#define MMF_PROC_SHARED      27      /* mm is shared while sighand is not */
>  #define MMF_DISABLE_THP_MASK (1 << MMF_DISABLE_THP)
>  
>  #define MMF_INIT_MASK                (MMF_DUMPABLE_MASK | 
> MMF_DUMP_FILTER_MASK |\
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 4d32190861bd..9177a76bf840 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1403,6 +1403,15 @@ static int copy_mm(unsigned long clone_flags, struct 
> task_struct *tsk)
>       if (clone_flags & CLONE_VM) {
>               mmget(oldmm);
>               mm = oldmm;
> +             if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_SIGHAND)) {
> +                     /* We need to synchronize with __set_oom_adj */
> +                     mutex_lock(&oom_adj_lock);
> +                     set_bit(MMF_PROC_SHARED, &mm->flags);
> +                     /* Update the values in case they were changed after 
> copy_signal */
> +                     tsk->signal->oom_score_adj = 
> current->signal->oom_score_adj;
> +                     tsk->signal->oom_score_adj_min = 
> current->signal->oom_score_adj_min;
> +                     mutex_unlock(&oom_adj_lock);
> +             }
>               goto good_mm;
>       }
>  
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index e90f25d6385d..c22f07c986cb 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ int sysctl_oom_dump_tasks = 1;
>   * and mark_oom_victim
>   */
>  DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_lock);
> +/* Serializes oom_score_adj and oom_score_adj_min updates */
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_adj_lock);
>  
>  static inline bool is_memcg_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.28.0.297.g1956fa8f8d-goog

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to