On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 15:44, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That's been said, not compensating the vruntime for a sched_idle task > > makes sense for me. Even if that will only help for others task in the > > same cfs_rq > > Yeah, but it is worth the extra pointer chasing and branches?
For that I let Jiang provides figures to show the worthful > > Then again, I suppose we started all that with the idle_h_nr_running > nonsense :/
