> On Aug 20, 2020, at 9:35 AM, pet...@infradead.org wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:17:29AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 05:21:11PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote: > >>> qemu-gdb stub should eat the event before it lands in the guest >> >> Are we sure about that? I triggered the warning just now, stepping >> through the debug handler. > > Not sure at all, that's what seemed reasonable, but since when did that > stop virt ;-) > > Also, can you trigger that same with upstream? Because I suspect this > ought to tickle the old code too. I’ve lost track of how many bugs QEMU and KVM have in this space. Let’s keep it as a warning, but a bug. But let’s get rid of the totally bogus TIF_SINGLESTEP manipulation.
- [RFC][PATCH 0/7] x86/debug: Untangle handle_debug() Peter Zijlstra
- [RFC][PATCH 6/7] x86/debug: Simplify #DB signal code Peter Zijlstra
- [PATCH 1/7] x86/debug: Allow a single level of #DB re... Peter Zijlstra
- [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/debug: Move historical SYSENTER ... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/debug: Move historical S... Brian Gerst
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/debug: Move historic... peterz
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/debug: Move hist... Josh Poimboeuf
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/debug: Move... peterz
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/debug: ... Josh Poimboeuf
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/deb... peterz
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/deb... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/deb... Josh Poimboeuf
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/deb... peterz
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86/debug: Move historical S... Daniel Thompson
- [RFC][PATCH 7/7] x86/debug: Move cond_local_irq_enabl... Peter Zijlstra
- [RFC][PATCH 2/7] x86/debug: Sync BTF earlier Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] x86/debug: Sync BTF earlier Thomas Gleixner
- [RFC][PATCH 5/7] x86/debug: Remove handle_debug(.user... Peter Zijlstra