On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 00:17 +0206, John Ogness wrote: > On 2020-08-20, Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote: > > And here it seems like the 'for (j =...)' loop is superfluous. > > AFAICT it is skipping duplicate entries. In the case of a duplicate, > only the first one is printed.
Ah, right. thanks.
