On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:25 AM Tanwar, Rahul
<rahul.tan...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 21/8/2020 6:56 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 05:32:11PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:

...

> >> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> >> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > We haven't settle this yet...
>
> I investigated more about it. I was getting build error because we were
> relying on of_device.h for including platform_device.h. You are right that
> we are not using anything from of_device.h. So i removed of_device.h from
> driver and added include <linux/platform_device.h> & build is ok.
>
> Regarding mod_devicetable.h header, it gets included indirectly from
> <linux/pwm.h> which includes of.h which includes mod_devicetable.h. So i
> think no point including it again in the driver.

Ideally you should include all headers you have direct users of.
mod_devicetable.h is exactly one and I doubt the pwm.h should include
it, but it's another story.

There are, of course, some cases when not all required because there
is a guarantee that upper one includes lower one. For example, if you
use bitops.h there is no need to include bits.h.

> >> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> >> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> >> +#include <linux/reset.h>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to