On (06/11/07 17:11), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> In order to support defragmentation on the dentry cache we need to have
> a determined object state at all times. Without a constructor the object
> would have a random state after allocation.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So provide a constructor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Seems to be some garbling on there in the signed-off lines.

> ---
>  fs/dcache.c |   26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c        2007-11-06 12:56:56.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c     2007-11-06 12:57:01.000000000 -0800
> @@ -870,6 +870,16 @@ static struct shrinker dcache_shrinker =
>       .seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
>  };
>  
> +void dcache_ctor(struct kmem_cache *s, void *p)
> +{
> +     struct dentry *dentry = p;
> +
> +     spin_lock_init(&dentry->d_lock);
> +     dentry->d_inode = NULL;
> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_lru);
> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_alias);
> +}
> +

Is there any noticable overhead to the constructor?

>  /**
>   * d_alloc   -       allocate a dcache entry
>   * @parent: parent of entry to allocate
> @@ -907,8 +917,6 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc(struct dentry * p
>  
>       atomic_set(&dentry->d_count, 1);
>       dentry->d_flags = DCACHE_UNHASHED;
> -     spin_lock_init(&dentry->d_lock);
> -     dentry->d_inode = NULL;
>       dentry->d_parent = NULL;
>       dentry->d_sb = NULL;
>       dentry->d_op = NULL;
> @@ -918,9 +926,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc(struct dentry * p
>       dentry->d_cookie = NULL;
>  #endif
>       INIT_HLIST_NODE(&dentry->d_hash);
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_lru);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_subdirs);
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_alias);
>  
>       if (parent) {
>               dentry->d_parent = dget(parent);
> @@ -2096,14 +2102,10 @@ static void __init dcache_init(void)
>  {
>       int loop;
>  
> -     /* 
> -      * A constructor could be added for stable state like the lists,
> -      * but it is probably not worth it because of the cache nature
> -      * of the dcache. 
> -      */
> -     dentry_cache = KMEM_CACHE(dentry,
> -             SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD);
> -     
> +     dentry_cache = kmem_cache_create("dentry_cache", sizeof(struct dentry),
> +             0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD,
> +             dcache_ctor);
> +
>       register_shrinker(&dcache_shrinker);
>  
>       /* Hash may have been set up in dcache_init_early */

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to