On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:58:19AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The way 'spin_lock()' and 'spin_lock_irqsave()' are used is not consistent
> in this function.
>
> Use 'spin_lock_irqsave()' also here, as there is no guarantee that
> interruptions are disabled at that point, according to surrounding code.
>
> Fixes: a97ec51b37ef ("nvmet_fc: Rework target side abort handling")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Not tested, only based on what looks logical to me according to
> surrounding code
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
