On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 19:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:46 PM Guilhem Lettron <guil...@barpilot.io> > wrote: > > > > I've done more tests, maybe it can give you more hints. > > I don't see that much differences between both (with and without > > patches) in this cases. > > OK, thanks! > > I'm assuming that the topmost two sets of data are for the "without > the patch" case whereas the other three correspond to the "with the > patch" case.
I think the sample period is too short. Even with the same kernel, I can see the Busy% varies from 1% to 9%, and the PkgWatt varies from 0.4W to 2.4W. thanks, rui > > If so, the processor clearly enters PC10 in both cases and the > residency percentages are similar. > > The numbers of times the POLL state was selected in the first test > look kind of unusual (relatively very large), but other than this the > patch doesn't seem to make much of a difference, so I'm not going to > apply it. > > Thanks!
