Currently the sign for CURRENT_NOW and CURRENT_AVG is a bit
of a mess. There are basically 3 different ways battery fuel
gauges report the current:

1. uses negative values for discharging and positive values
   for charging
2. uses positive values for discharging and negative values
   for discharging (opposit of 1)
3. only uses positive values

As a result userspace currently cannot use the sign at all in
a generic way. Let's solve the issue by documenting a canonical
way for reporting the data and ensure new drivers follow this
way. Then existing drivers can be fixed on a case-by-case basis.

The 'negative value = battery discharging' has been choosen,
since there are only very few drivers doing it the other way
around.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>
---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-power | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-power 
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-power
index 651599fb18f8..dbccb2fcd7ce 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-power
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-power
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ Description:
                which they average readings to smooth out the reported value.
 
                Access: Read
-               Valid values: Represented in microamps
+               Valid values: Represented in microamps. Negative values are used
+               for discharging batteries, positive values for charging 
batteries.
 
 What:          /sys/class/power_supply/<supply_name>/current_max
 Date:          October 2010
@@ -127,7 +128,8 @@ Description:
                This value is not averaged/smoothed.
 
                Access: Read
-               Valid values: Represented in microamps
+               Valid values: Represented in microamps. Negative values are used
+               for discharging batteries, positive values for charging 
batteries.
 
 What:          /sys/class/power_supply/<supply_name>/charge_control_limit
 Date:          Oct 2012
-- 
2.28.0

Reply via email to