On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 22:29:12 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 07:32:11PM +0000, eddy...@trendmicro.com wrote:
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > @@ -1311,24 +1257,23 @@ void kprobe_busy_end(void)
> > >  void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struct *tk)
> > >  {
> > >         struct kretprobe_instance *ri;
> > > +       struct llist_node *node;
> > >
> > > +       /* Early boot, not yet initialized. */
> > >         if (unlikely(!kprobes_initialized))
> > >                 return;
> > >
> > >         kprobe_busy_begin();
> > >
> > > +       node = current->kretprobe_instances.first;
> > > +       current->kretprobe_instances.first = NULL;
> > 
> > I think we are flushing tk instead of current here.
> > After fixing this to tk, the NULL pointer deference is gone!
> 

Cool!!

> Ah, very good! I can indeed confirm that that cures things.

OK, I'll merge this too.

Thank you,

> 
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1275,9 +1275,7 @@ void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struc
> 
>       kprobe_busy_begin();
> 
> -     node = current->kretprobe_instances.first;
> -     current->kretprobe_instances.first = NULL;
> -
> +     node == __llist_del_all(&tk->kretprobe_instances);
>       while (node) {
>               ri = container_of(node, struct kretprobe_instance, llist);
>               node = node->next;
> @@ -1871,6 +1869,7 @@ unsigned long __kretprobe_trampoline_han
>       struct llist_node *first, *node;
>       struct kretprobe *rp;
> 
> +     /* Find all nodes for this frame. */
>       first = node = current->kretprobe_instances.first;
>       while (node) {
>               ri = container_of(node, struct kretprobe_instance, llist);
> @@ -1900,7 +1899,7 @@ unsigned long __kretprobe_trampoline_han
>       while (first) {
>               ri = container_of(first, struct kretprobe_instance, llist);
>               rp = get_kretprobe(ri);
> -             node = first->next;
> +             first = first->next;
> 
>               if (rp && rp->handler) {
>                       __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &rp->kp);
> @@ -1910,8 +1909,6 @@ unsigned long __kretprobe_trampoline_han
>               }
> 
>               recycle_rp_inst(ri);
> -
> -             first = node;
>       }
> 
>       return (unsigned long)correct_ret_addr;
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/llist.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/llist.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/llist.h
> @@ -237,6 +237,14 @@ static inline struct llist_node *llist_d
>       return xchg(&head->first, NULL);
>  }
> 
> +static inline struct llist_node *__llist_del_all(struct llist_head *head)
> +{
> +     struct llist_node *first = head->first;
> +
> +     head->first = NULL;
> +     return first;
> +}
> +
>  extern struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head);
> 
>  struct llist_node *llist_reverse_order(struct llist_node *head);
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to