Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 05:27:21PM CEST, mo...@mellanox.com wrote:
>Add devlink reload action to allow the user to request a specific reload
>action. The action parameter is optional, if not specified then devlink
>driver re-init action is used (backward compatible).
>Note that when required to do firmware activation some drivers may need
>to reload the driver. On the other hand some drivers may need to reset
>the firmware to reinitialize the driver entities. Therefore, the devlink
>reload command returns the actions which were actually done.
>However, in case fw_activate_no_reset action is selected, then no other
>reload action is allowed.
>Reload actions supported are:
>driver_reinit: driver entities re-initialization, applying devlink-param
>               and devlink-resource values.
>fw_activate: firmware activate.
>fw_activate_no_reset: Activate new firmware image without any reset.
>                      (also known as: firmware live patching).
>
>command examples:
>$devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action driver_reinit
>reload_actions_done:
>  driver_reinit
>
>$devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action fw_activate
>reload_actions_done:
>  driver_reinit fw_activate
>
>Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <mo...@mellanox.com>
>---
>v2 -> v3:
>- Replace fw_live_patch action by fw_activate_no_reset
>- Devlink reload returns the actions done over netlink reply
>v1 -> v2:
>- Instead of reload levels driver,fw_reset,fw_live_patch have reload
>  actions driver_reinit,fw_activate,fw_live_patch
>- Remove driver default level, the action driver_reinit is the default
>  action for all drivers
>---

[...]


>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c 
>b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
>index 08d101138fbe..c42b66d88884 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
>@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ mlxsw_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink, struct 
>devlink_info_req *req,
> 
> static int
> mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
>-                                        bool netns_change,
>+                                        bool netns_change, enum 
>devlink_reload_action action,
>                                         struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
>       struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
>@@ -1126,15 +1126,23 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct 
>devlink *devlink,
> }
> 
> static int
>-mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
>-                                      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>+mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum 
>devlink_reload_action action,
>+                                      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, 
>unsigned long *actions_done)
> {
>       struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
>+      int err;
> 
>-      return mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
>-                                            mlxsw_core->bus,
>-                                            mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
>-                                            devlink, extack);
>+      err = mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
>+                                           mlxsw_core->bus,
>+                                           mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
>+                                           devlink, extack);
>+      if (err)
>+              return err;
>+      if (actions_done)
>+              *actions_done = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
>+                              BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE);
>+
>+      return 0;
> }
> 
> static int mlxsw_devlink_flash_update(struct devlink *devlink,
>@@ -1268,6 +1276,8 @@ mlxsw_devlink_trap_policer_counter_get(struct devlink 
>*devlink,
> }
> 
> static const struct devlink_ops mlxsw_devlink_ops = {
>+      .supported_reload_actions       = 
>BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
>+                                        
>BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE),

This is confusing and open to interpretation. Does this mean that the
driver supports:
1) REINIT && FW_ACTIVATE
2) REINIT || FW_ACTIVATE
?

Because mlxsw supports only 1. I guess that mlx5 supports both. This
needs to be distinguished.

I think you need an array of combinations. Or perhaps rather to extend
the enum with combinations. You kind of have it already with
DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE_NO_RESET

Maybe we can have something like:
DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT
DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT_FW_ACTIVATE_RESET
DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE_RESET
DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE (this is the original FW_ACTIVATE_NO_RESET)

Each has very clear meaning.

Also, then the "actions_done" would be a simple enum, directly returned
to the user. No bitfield needed.


>       .reload_down            = mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down,
>       .reload_up              = mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up,
>       .port_type_set                  = mlxsw_devlink_port_type_set,

[...]

Reply via email to