On 8/30/20 7:23 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Function dequeue_huge_page_node_exact() iterates the free list and
> return the first valid free hpage.
> 
> Instead of break and check the loop variant, we could return in the loop
> directly. This could reduce some redundant check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 20 ++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 7b3357c1dcec..709be7ab65af 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1040,21 +1040,17 @@ static struct page 
> *dequeue_huge_page_node_exact(struct hstate *h, int nid)
>               if (nocma && is_migrate_cma_page(page))
>                       continue;
>  
> -             if (!PageHWPoison(page))
> +             if (PageHWPoison(page))
>                       break;

Previously, when encountering a PageHWPoison(page) the loop would continue
and check the next page in the list.  It now breaks the loop and returns
NULL.  Is not this a change in behavior?  Perhaps you want to change that
break to a continue.  Or, restructure in some other way.
-- 
Mike Kravetz

> +
> +             list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
> +             set_page_refcounted(page);
> +             h->free_huge_pages--;
> +             h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
> +             return page;
>       }
>  
> -     /*
> -      * if 'non-isolated free hugepage' not found on the list,
> -      * the allocation fails.
> -      */
> -     if (&h->hugepage_freelists[nid] == &page->lru)
> -             return NULL;
> -     list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
> -     set_page_refcounted(page);
> -     h->free_huge_pages--;
> -     h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
> -     return page;
> +     return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(struct hstate *h, gfp_t 
> gfp_mask, int nid,
> 

Reply via email to