On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 04:41:59PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
>
> /home/rdunlap/lnx/lnx-59-rc2/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182:
> WARNING: Title underline too short.
> Indefinite DMA Fences
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad
> idea")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
Applied to drm-misc-fixes, thanks for your patch.
-Daniel
> ---
> Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- lnx-59-rc2.orig/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> +++ lnx-59-rc2/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File
> :internal:
>
> Indefinite DMA Fences
> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait()
> finishes have been proposed. Examples include:
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
