On 08/31, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ struct wait_opts {
>  
>       wait_queue_entry_t              child_wait;
>       int                     notask_error;
> +     int                     eagain_error;
>  };
>  
>  static int eligible_pid(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -1461,6 +1462,8 @@ static long do_wait(struct wait_opts *wo)
>  
>  notask:
>       retval = wo->notask_error;
> +     if (!retval)
> +             retval = wo->eagain_error;
>       if (!retval && !(wo->wo_flags & WNOHANG)) {
>               retval = -ERESTARTSYS;

I must have missed something but I don't understand why do we need
the new ->eagain_error and the change in do_wait().

> @@ -1544,6 +1551,11 @@ static long kernel_waitid(int which, pid_t upid, 
> struct waitid_info *infop,
>       wo.wo_flags     = options;
>       wo.wo_info      = infop;
>       wo.wo_rusage    = ru;
> +     wo.eagain_error = 0;
> +     if (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> +             wo.wo_flags     |= WNOHANG;
> +             wo.eagain_error = -EAGAIN;
> +     }
>       ret = do_wait(&wo);

Can't kernel_waitid() simply do

        if (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
                wo.wo_flags |= WNOHANG;
        ret = do_wait();
        if (!ret & (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
                ret = -EAGAIN;

?

Oleg.

Reply via email to