On Nov 13, 2007 10:52 AM, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007 09:23:12 Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Better might be to put in a waitqueue and wake it up whenever a module is
> > deleted or changes status.  Then use_module() can wait if
> > strong_try_module_get() returns -EBUSY (up to 30 seconds, then print a
> > warning and fail).
>

Will it ever go into a deadlock (or likewise DOS scenario) if modA dep
on modB, but modB also dep on modA?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to