On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:34:19 +0100 "Thomas Lindroth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:46:43 +0000 Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > [PATCH] pata_amd/pata_via: de-couple programming of PIO/MWDMA and UDMA > > timings > > > > > > > > * Don't program UDMA timings when programming PIO or MWDMA modes. > > > > > > > > This has also a nice side-effect of fixing regression added by > > commit > > > > 681c80b5d96076f447e8101ac4325c82d8dce508 ("libata: correct handling > > of > > > > SRST reset sequences") (->set_piomode method for PIO0 is called > > before > > > > ->cable_detect method which checks UDMA timings to get the cable > > type). > > > > > > I'm not sure this helps as if the ACPI _GTF method is looking at the > > > flags and stuff but it has to be worth a try. > > > > > > > > > Works for me as a 2.6.24 band aid > > > > I'm looking at that "Untested, please don't merge until it is confirmed to > > fix the problem." comment.. > > > > Thomas, can you please give it a try, let us know? > > > > Thanks > > > > I can confirm that the patch "pata_amd/pata_via: de-couple programming of > PIO/MWDMA and UDMA timings" does fix my issue "pata_amd fails to detect > 80-pin wire". > Great, thanks for testing it. I moved that patch to the "to send to maintainers as a 2.6.24 fix" queue. I should get all that material sent out hopefully tomorrow, if I can manage to get 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 to limp out the door. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/