On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:09:25 +0530 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:00:45AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:09:19 +0530 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Move kprobes examples from Documentation/kprobes.txt to under samples/. > > > Patch originally by Randy Dunlap. > > > > > > In addition, I have > > > > > > o Updated the patch to apply on 2.6.23-mm1 > > > o Modified examples code to build on multiple architectures. Currently, > > > the examples code works for x86_64, x86_32 and powerpc > > > o Cleaned up unneeded #includes > > > > Could you please take a look at what's needed to get this working on > > sparc64? > > > > samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c: In function `ret_handler': > > samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c:19: error: implicit declaration of > > function `regs_return_value' > > > > Thanks. > > As Davem mentions, these are a fallout of sparc64 not having kretprobe > support. As a followup to this mail, I am sending a couple of patches > that should fix the issue (sparc64 cross compile works fine with the > patches). > Thanks. > This patch depends on Mathieu Desnoyers' "Instrumentation menu removal" > patchset (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119496432229633&w=2) argh. OK, I'll look at this later in the week. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
