On 03/09/20 02:44, B wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Valentin Schneider [mailto:valentin.schnei...@arm.com] >> On 02/09/20 04:24, B wrote: >> > I agree with your idea to remove the topology functionality of MPIDR , >> > but I think we need also consider ARM32 and GIC. >> > >> >> Could you please elaborate? This change doesn't impact arch_topology, so >> only arm64 is affected. > > Yes, this change only affects arm64, my question is that do we need to > leverage it to arm32 since arm32 got the same issue. > > And for GIC we are also using MPIDR for the topology info, but I am sure > It's got the same issue or not, just a suggestion to have a look.
So technically yes, we can be bothered by this on arm32 - Sudeep pointed out a list of DT files that shows platforms with non-zero values in Aff1 or above. However, the bigger issue is that artificial separation in clusters of 16 CPUs due to extra limitations on Aff0 (mainly due to GICv3 AIUI). Given that GICv2 can support at most 8 CPU interfaces, I don't think we have it as bad on arm32.