dropped the maintainers.
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020, Ayush wrote: > Sir, > > > As the mentor in the linux kernel community bridge program, I usually > > inform the mentees when the review on the mentee mailing list has > > successfully concluded to a first acceptable state and I think it is well > > advised to reach out to the maintainers for further discussion. > > > > You did not do that, but just send some patch to the maintainers. > > That is fully up to you, but I will not support the patch acceptance in > > any way, and it suggests that you do not see the need to be mentored. > > > > If you can land patches without mentoring support successfully, that is > > great, but then you do not need a mentorship. > > I am extremely sorry for my mistakes. It won't happen again. > > > Now, to the commit: > > > > Ayush, your commit message is largely incomprehensible. > > > > Your follow-up explanation that was needed should have been in the commit > > message in the first place. > > It was my first patch, so I had very little idea of forming commit messages. > I will discuss it with mentors next time before sending the patch next time. > Let us start with the simpler patch and then see if you can write a commit message that convinces Joe to ack your patch. > > Ayush, you did not sign-off with your full legal name. > > My legal name according to all official identification documents of India is > Ayush. > I have no surname registered legally. > So should I include "Ayush <ay...@disroot.org>" or do I need to include my > last name too (Which is Ayush only)? > Okay. If you say so, I cannot judge but you should try to use a name that others can with a fair chance uniquely identify that is you. The name is used in git log summaries, pull requests, etc.; so, it should be a name that with high chance to refer to one person. Maybe you find a good way that works as suitable name for unique identification? Lukas
