On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 09:05:02PM +0800, qianjun.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: jun qian <qianjun.ker...@gmail.com>
> 
> It is hard to understand what the meaning of the value from
> the return value of wakeup_preempt_entity, so I fix it.

> @@ -6822,9 +6828,9 @@ static unsigned long wakeup_gran(struct sched_entity 
> *se)
>   *         g
>   *      |<--->|c
>   *
> - *  w(c, s1) = -1
> - *  w(c, s2) =  0
> - *  w(c, s3) =  1
> + *  w(c, s1) = NO_NEED_PREEMPT
> + *  w(c, s2) = MAY_NEED_PREEMPT
> + *  w(c, s3) = NEED_PREEMPT
>   *
>   */

Yeah, I don't think so. The function is a simple C style compare,
where negative is less, 0 is equal and positive is more than.


Reply via email to