On 14/09/20 01:09PM, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Pratyush,
>
> Am 2020-09-14 11:40, schrieb Pratyush Yadav:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > *sigh* This patch will cause a _lot_ of conflicts with my series [0]. It
> > should hopefully go in the next merge window so maybe you can rebase on
> > top of it? Dunno.
>
> Could you pick up this patch in some form in your series? It looks like your
> series touches most/some of the functions. The patch just removes code
> repetitions.
I don't want to make any last-minute changes that could end up blocking
the series. Its been pending for many months now.
> TBH I don't need this patch as I just can implement my new one-byte command
> using the current "if (nor->spimem) {} else {}" pattern.
It is up to you what you want to do about the patch. Maybe you can drop
it now and send it later when things have settled down? Dunno.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
