On 9/15/20 1:17 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > On 15/09/20 12:16PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >> >> >> On 9/3/20 10:42 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This series adds support for Octal DTR flashes in the SPI NOR framework, >>> and then adds hooks for the Cypress Semper and Micron Xcella flashes to >>> allow running them in Octal DTR mode. This series assumes that the flash >>> is handed to the kernel in Legacy SPI mode. >>> >>> Tested on TI J721E EVM with 1-bit ECC on the Cypress flash. >>> >> [...] >> >> Please fix checkpatch issues on patch 1, 3, 4 and 5 > > I ran checkpatch on my patches based on top of next-20200914 just now. I > only see issues with patches 3 and 4. Patches 1 and 5 report no issues. > What problems do you see on patches 1 and 5? > Please run with --strict argument to checkpatch. You can see the issues at: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/5pPWcGNsmp/ > As for patches 3 and 4, the error I see is "ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 > error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP". I left it in intentionally. There a > couple other functions in SPI NOR that use ENOTSUPP instead of > EOPNOTSUPP so I followed the local convention. > This is a recent addition to checkpatch: 6b9ea5ff5abd ("checkpatch: warn about uses of ENOTSUPP"). > If you insist, I can add a preparatory patch that first changes those > uses of ENOTSUPP to EOPNOTSUPP and then update patches 3 and 4 to do the > same. Let me know. > Changing existing usage of ENOTSUPP to EOPNOTSUPP is a separate exercise and patches are welcome. But any new addition of ENOTSUPP would need to be avoided. Regards Vignesh