On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 16:47, Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:29 PM Andy Shevchenko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:43:27PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> > > > > > > It's possible for a GPIO chip to not have a parent device (whose > > > properties we inspect for 'gpio-line-names'). In this case we should > > > simply return from devprop_gpiochip_set_names(). Add an appropriate > > > check for this use-case. > > > > Ah, nice! > > Can we also add a small comment in the code, b/c w/o it I would stumble over > > and eager to remove looks-as-unneeded check? > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <[email protected]>
